Tezin Türü: Yüksek Lisans
Tezin Yürütüldüğü Kurum: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İşletme Fakültesi, İngilizce İktisat Bölümü, Türkiye
Tezin Onay Tarihi: 2022
Tezin Dili: İngilizce
Öğrenci: Mert Abay
Danışman: Emine Sedef Akgüngör
Özet:
rtment of
Economics (English)
Economics
(English) Program
Smart specialization strategies have
become a major framework for the European Union (EU) after the 2008 financial
crisis to support innovation and sustainable growth. Although smart specialization
is an effectively used policy in the EU, little is known about its validity for
Turkey. This thesis empirically investigates the impact of smart specialization
variables (relatedness and complexity) on technological change (entry and exit
of technologies to and from regions) for Turkey’s regions at NUTS-3 level over
the period of 1978-2017 using patent data from OECD-REGPAT database.
Using logistic regression and linear probability
model, the thesis discovers the patterns of technological specialization in
Turkey and provides policy makers with a policy perspective in line with the
smart specialization framework. GDP per capita, population, number of
universities, and number of techno parks of regions are included as control
variables.
The results show that the coefficients
of relatedness density, population, and per capita GDP variables are positive
and significant in the entry model in which the emergence of new technologies
in the regions is examined. In the exit model, where the abandonment of
technologies is examined, the coefficients of the knowledge complexity and
techno park variables are negative and significant. The results show that the patterns of technological
change in Turkey differ based on the existing knowledge and capabilities of the regions,
which is in line with the assumptions of smart specialization. Thus, it is
suggested that innovation policies would yield better results when designed
based on unique characteristics of regions and region-specific objectives.
Keywords: Smart
Specialization, Technological Change, Relatedness Density, Knowledge
Complexity.