Evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Videos on Youtube


Akyol R., Akkoca F.

Akdeniz Dental Journal, cilt.3, sa.3, ss.88-97, 2024 (Hakemli Dergi)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 3 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.62268/add.1579855
  • Dergi Adı: Akdeniz Dental Journal
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.88-97
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objectives:

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an imaging modality that plays an im-

portant role in dental practice. However, it is unclear whether videos with adequate

and accurate information are available on a platform such as YouTube. The aim of

this study was to determine whether CBCT videos posted on YouTube are indeed a

valuable source of information.

Material and Methods

During the data collection process, we analyzed Google Trends searches using the

keywords "cone beam computed tomography (in Turkish)", "dental tomography (in

Turkish)", and "tooh tomography (in Turkish)" over the last 5 years. Then, 168 vid-

eos were analyzed as a result of searches on YouTube with these keywords. Among

these videos, 48 were included in the study according to certain criteria. The number

of view, viewing times, number of like, interaction index and viewing rate of the

included videos were calculated. The upload source of the videos was categorized

as clinic, dentist, educational channel, commercial, professional organization and

TV channel. According to the upload source of the videos, the image quality, sound

quality, narrator, purpose of the video, usefulness scoring and Global Quality Scale

were evaluated.

Results

The average number of views of the analyzed videos was determined as 1559.95,

while the standard deviation value was determined as 2435.30. The average interac-

tion index was 1.58, and the standard deviation value was 1.77. The average view

rate was 377.55, and the standard deviation value was 956.88. Significant relation-

ships were found between the upload source of the videos and the duration of the

video, the number of subscribers of the channel that uploaded the video, and the

number of likes (p=0.016, p=0.021, p=0.030, respectively). In addition, when the

videos were evaluated in terms of their usability levels, significant relationships

were found between the duration of the video, the number of likes, and the interac-

tion index (p=0.001, p=0.009, p=0.015, respectively).

Conclusion

This study reveals that CBCT videos posted on YouTube are generally of low quality

and not informative. This highlights the need for reliable sources of information for

dentists, patients, and future dentists.

Key Words

Cone beam computed tomography, Social media, Radiology