Regional fMRI-based lateralization in presurgical language-dominant patients


Kemik K., Ada E., Aykaç C., Çavuşoğlu B., Alnour Z., Baklan B.

ECNP (European College of Neuropsychopharmacology) 2025, Amsterdam, Hollanda, 11 - 14 Ekim 2025, (Yayınlanmadı)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Yayınlanmadı
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Amsterdam
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Hollanda
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Introduction

Understanding brain lateralization is critical for neurosurgical planning and

neuropsychopharmacological applications. Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) provides a powerful

tool for examining hemispheric dominance, particularly in pre-operative patients. However,

global whole-brain analysis may introduce variability, necessitating a more focused regional

analysis. This study aims to assess lateralization indices across different brain networks and

to evaluate the reliability of rs-fMRI for determining dominant hemispheres.

Objective

To quantify and compare laterality indices (LI) across whole-brain, language network, and

frontoparietal network regions, ensuring a clearer understanding of hemispheric dominance

in clinically pre-operative right-dominant patients.

Methods

The study included 25 pre-operative patients, all clinically determined as right dominant. MRI

scans were performed using a 1.5 T MR Intera Achieva scanner (Philips Medical Systems,

Best, The Netherlands) equipped with a SENSE-Head8 coil. Anatomical imaging was

conducted using a T1-weighted inversion-recovery scan with the following parameters: TR =

2494 ms, TE = 15 ms, Flip Angle = 90°, and ETL = 5. The matrix resolution was 512 × 512,

with a slice thickness of 4 mm.

For both task-based and resting-state fMRI, T2-weighted gradient echo-planar imaging was

used. The acquisition parameters were TR = 3000 ms, TE = 50 ms, Flip Angle = 90°, with a

field of view (FOV) of 230 mm and RFOV of 100%. The scans were acquired with a slice

thickness of 4 mm, no gap, a 64 × 64 matrix, and ETL of 48, NA = 1, capturing approximately

28 slices per volume. The resting-state fMRI acquisitions consisted of 80 dynamic series,

ensuring a comprehensive assessment of intrinsic functional connectivity.

Data Processing & Analysis

 Preprocessing: FSL was used for brain extraction and motion correction.

 Independent Component Analysis (ICA): Performed with single-session ICA

(6mm, 12 DoF) for dimensionality reduction.

 LI Calculation: Laterality indices were extracted using FSLmaths and Python.

 Thresholding:

o Whole-brain LI threshold > 0.15

o Frontoparietal network LI threshold < 0.15


Results


Table: Summary of Lateralization Indices and Dominant Hemisphere Classification


Brain Region Dominant Group Number of Patients Mean LI

Whole Brain Right Dominant 14 0.0629

Left Dominant 8 -0.0221

Bilateral 2 0.0015

Language Network Right Dominant 11 0.5430

Left Dominant 13 -

Frontoparietal

Network


Right Dominant 25 3718.4695


Left Dominant 0 -

Bilateral 0 -

Discussion

1. Importance of Task-Based Imaging for Hemispheric Determination

o Although rs-fMRI is a robust tool for assessing functional connectivity, task-

based fMRI has been widely used to determine hemispheric dominance,

particularly for motor and language processing.

o The inclusion of task-based paradigms may further enhance the interpretation

of dominance beyond intrinsic connectivity metrics obtained via rs-fMRI.


2. Strengths of Laterality Index (LI) and Prior ROC Analyses

o Previous studies using ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analyses

have demonstrated high discriminatory power of the laterality index in

distinguishing dominant hemispheres.

o Our findings support the utility of LI-based analysis, particularly when

specific ROIs (such as frontoparietal and language networks) are considered

rather than relying solely on whole-brain approaches.


3. Network-Specific Insights:

o The whole-brain analysis displayed more variability in dominance

classification, indicating the potential for confounding effects when analyzing

all regions together.

o The language network exhibited a more balanced distribution of dominance

across patients, highlighting the need for individualized assessments.

o The frontoparietal network demonstrated strong right lateralization in all

patients, suggesting that this region may serve as a reliable marker for

identifying dominant hemispheres.


Conclusions

 While whole-brain LI analysis provides a general measure of lateralization,

network-specific analyses (especially the frontoparietal network) offer clearer

hemispheric classification.

 Task-based fMRI remains a critical tool in validating and refining rs-fMRI-based

laterality findings.

 ROC-based validation of LI values in previous studies highlights its utility as a strong

biomarker for lateralization.


 This study supports the integration of both rs-fMRI and task-based imaging for

comprehensive hemispheric dominance assessment in neurosurgical and clinical

settings.

Future Directions

 Investigate multi-modal integration of resting-state and task-based fMRI in

dominant hemisphere determination.

 Further validation of LI cutoffs via ROC analyses to establish clinically applicable

thresholds for hemisphere dominance.

 Consider additional ROI-based LI comparisons across different clinical populations.