JOURNAL OF BASIC AND CLINICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, cilt.9, sa.2, 2025 (ESCI)
Background and Purpose: Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) is a widely used rehabilitation approach. However, limited studies examine the effect of PNF in a critical care setting. We aimed to investigate the acute effects of PNF-based exercises compared to active range of motion (ROM) exercises on respiratory and hemodynamic responses in critically ill patients. Methods: Twenty-one spontaneously breathing non-intubated critically ill patients were randomly assigned to either PNF-based (n=10) or active ROM exercise group (n=11). Respiratory rate (RR; breath/min), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO(2); %), heart rate (HR; beat/min), systolic blood pressure (SBP; mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (DBP; mmHg) and mean blood pressure (MBP; mmHg) were measured using bedside monitoring system. The dyspnea severity and perceived exertion of patients were evaluated using the 0-10 numeric rating scale. Data was recorded before, immediately after, and 5 minutes after each exercise session. Results: There were no clinically significant differences between groups in RR (breath/min), SpO(2) (%), HR (beat/min), SBP (mmHg), DBP (mmHg), and MBP (mmHg), the severity of dyspnea and perceived exertion (P>0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of spontaneously breathing non-intubated patients, PNF technique can be applied safely in terms of respiratory and hemodynamic responses, similar to active ROM exercises.