Izmir International Conference on Technology and Social Sciences, İzmir, Turkey, 17 - 19 August 2022, pp.1-3
Global Capital and High Value-Added Products: India and South Korea
Abstract
Informatics,
knowledge-based development and development models have become privileged
targets for national economies. It is essential for all nations to develop
their economies using knowledge-based development models. NASDAQ (National
Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations), an international
finance company headquartered in the United States, experienced a six- to
sevenfold increase in value in the early 2000s compared to the preceding
decade. Globalization began to encompass all countries by the end of the 1990s,
particularly with the advent of the Internet and other information
technologies. Due to the influence of their diasporas, the stability of their
states' sector policies, the low cost of their labor force, and their command
of the English language, countries operating on the international stage, such
as Israel, India, and Ireland, have begun to attract their countries rapidly
[1].
Companies of
all sizes, which are expanding rapidly in the information industry, have begun
to direct the information industry as well as other industries. The market has
become more competitive, the source of capital has emerged as a significant
issue for businesses, and the form and direction of investment have begun to
diversify. In addition, the rapidly growing number of entrepreneurs in the IT
industry has made it difficult for companies to maintain their market share. At
this time, the significance of alternative financing methods has grown [9,10].
Angel investing, a new type of investor, has grown in prominence during this
time period [9,13]. Angel investors are individuals who invest their own money
in a business, either individually or as part of a group [14]. For instance,
beginning in the 2000s, Israeli technology companies began to attract
substantial venture capital. Moreover, the activities of technology companies
that are particularly successful in their home countries in the United States
and the trading of their shares on the NASDAQ have created a positive momentum
for these companies to receive even more investment and for the development of
national technology companies [1].
Increasing
international capital continued to invest not only in the United States, but
also in numerous other regions of the globe. Countries desired to manage these
capital and foreign currency inflows as a matter of course. Prior to 1984, the
Indian government, for instance, aimed to gain the confidence of the hardware
industry through its policies. Many multinational corporations, including
Cisco, IBM, Microsoft, General Electric, and Fujitsu, have invested in India,
particularly since the 1990s. In 2000, exports increased from 734 million
dollars in 1996 to 4 billion dollars. By 2012, the Indian market for
information technology had reached a size of $100 billion [3]. During
the relevant period, 100 companies which is in the Fortune 500 list companies
outsource to India [2]. With the influence of the diaspora, not only India but also
Ireland attracted large investments from the United States in this sector.
Israel's NASDAQ expansion strategies, strong funding support, and rapidly
expanding software companies paved the way for multinational corporations to
invest in their country.
The Foreign
Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) implemented on 1973, which imposed a 40 percent
cap on foreign ownership of Indian corporations. In the late 1970s, as a
result, many foreign corporations left India. During the 1980s, however, there
was a reversal in policy stance, resulting in a more open and constructive
attitude towards liberalization of industrial and trade policies, foreign
direct investment, and international cooperation [4]. FERA, or the Foreign
Exchange Regulation Act, is a law that imposes stringent regulations on certain
types of payments, foreign exchange, and securities, as well as transactions
that have an indirect impact on foreign exchange exports and imports [5].
Particularly in the 2000s, small and medium-sized software companies protested
against the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act-FERA, which was enacted to control
a substantial amount of foreign currency coming from abroad[2].
There is also a
gap in the literature regarding the concept of products with high added value.
The relationship between innovation, value-added, and development, as well as
the definition of the value-added product, are not adequately explained [6]. In
addition, export and innovation-based export practices are essential for
producing these goods and competing in the global market [7].
Turkey
occasionally announces action plans in this direction. The Ministry of Industry
and Technology's technology-oriented industry relocation program was published
in the Official Gazette in 2019 and put into effect [8]. The Organization for
Economic Development and Cooperation exports products on behalf of a country;
based on the proportion of research and development expenditures in the total
added value, inputs, and the technology level of intermediate products, it is
categorized as high, medium-high, medium-low, and low technology [11], and
exporting high-tech products is valued in terms of demonstrating a sustainable
competitive performance on global markets [11,12].
Investments of
international capitals in products with high added value, money flows, and
their effects on national economies are systematically examined in this study.
Their success in producing high value-added products for countries such as
India and South Korea is considered worthy of research by researchers and
companies operating in the sector.. At this point, all nations can develop
national strategies for the high income that can be obtained from these
products and formulate policies. The study evaluates the concept of high
value-added products in all of its dimensions, as well as the concept of
international capital and the structure of the NASDAQ. Examining the relevant
literature reveals that the studies are primarily concerned with attracting
international capital to countries and the strategies to be implemented at this
stage. At this point in the study, with the evaluation of the subject within
the context of potential risks and examples, recommendations are made for
researchers, policymakers, and policymakers, and the subject is evaluated
comprehensively.
Keywords— High value-added products, software industry, risk, investment, international capital, India, South Korea.
References
[1] Alican, F. (2011). Yol, İnsandan
İnsanlığa Uzanan Bir Bilişim Öyküsü. Caretta: İstanbul.
[2] Alican,
F. (2006). Ekonomik ve Sosyal Boyutlarıyla Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Yazılım
Sektörü. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
[3] Bhattacharjee, S., &
Chakrabarti, D. (2015). Investigating India's competitive edge in the IT-ITeS
sector. IIMB Management Review, 27(1), 19-34.
[4]
CUTS, (2022).CUTS Centre forCompetition, Investment& Economic
RegulationDiscussion Paper.
0332Investment Policy in India ñ Performance and Perceptions. Erişim Tarihi:
05/05/2022. https://cuts-ccier.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Investment_Policy_in_India–Performance_and_Perceptions.pdf
[5] FERA,
(2022). Foreign Exchange Management Act. Erişim Tarihi: 25/05/2022.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_Exchange_Management_Act
[6] Güneş, S., Togay, A., & Güneş, Ç.
(2015). Katma Değer ve Kalkınma Bağlamında Ürün Tasarımı. Sanat ve
Tasarım Dergisi, (16), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.18603/std.76973
[7] Çetin,
K., & Gedik, H. (2017). İnovasyon Ve İhracat Performansı İlişkisi: Karaman
Örneği. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi,
109-126. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.346605
[8] TCST, (2022).Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Sanayi
ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı, Teknoloji Okdalı Sanayi Hamlesi Programı Uygulama
Esasları Tebliği. Erişim Tarihi: 25/05/2022. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2019/09/20190918-7.htm
[9]
Kurnaz, G., & Bedük, A. (2017). Türkiye’de ve Dünyada melek
yatırımcılık. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu
Dergisi, 20(1), 27-40.
[10] Günay,
S. G., & Başalp, A. (2011). Girişimciler, melek yatırımcılar ve risk
sermayesi firmaları arasında kurulacak bir ağ, bu ağın yapısı ve önemi. Business
and Economics Research Journal, 2(2), 153-164.
[11] Güneş,
S., & Tuğba, A. K. I. N. (2019). Yüksek teknolojili ürün i̇hracatı: Lider ülkeler ve Türkiye analizi. Sosyoekonomi, 27(40),
11-29.
[12] Kesbiç, C. Y., & Kirman, A.
(2020). Katma Değerin Yüksek Teknoloji İhracatı Üzerindeki Etkisinin OECD
Ülkeleri Açısından Analizi. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 57(654),
99-117.
[13] Mitteness,
C., Sudek, R., & Cardon, M. S. (2012). Angel investor characteristics that
determine whether perceived passion leads to higher evaluations of funding
potential. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(5),
592-606.
[14] Benjamin, G. A., & Margulis, J. B. (2000). Angel financing: How to find and invest in private equity. Canada: John Wiley & Sons.