Relationships Among Spiritual Well-being, Adjustment, and Quality of Life in Patients With a Stoma: A Cross-sectional, Descriptive Study


AYİK C., ÖZDEN D., Cenan D.

WOUND MANAGEMENT & PREVENTION, cilt.65, sa.5, ss.40-47, 2019 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 65 Sayı: 5
  • Basım Tarihi: 2019
  • Doi Numarası: 10.25270/wmp.2019.5.4047
  • Dergi Adı: WOUND MANAGEMENT & PREVENTION
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.40-47
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: clinical study, ostomy, adjustment, quality of life, spirituality, COLORECTAL-CANCER SURVIVORS, PSYCHOSOCIAL ADJUSTMENT, INTESTINAL STOMA, CHINESE PATIENTS, MUSLIM PATIENTS, COLOSTOMY, HEALTH, ADAPTATION, PEOPLE, GENDER
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Individual spiritual preferences and adjustment to a stoma may affect quality of life. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship among and the factors that influence spiritual well-being, adjustment to a stoma, and quality of life in patients with astoma. METHODS: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted over 6 months among outpatients with a stoma recruited from general surgery and enterostomal therapy clinics of a university hospital in Turkey. Turkish-speaking patients who were at least 18 years of age and had a colostomy or ileostomy for at least 2 months were eligible to participate. Participants independently(or with researcher help if necessary) completed the Sociodemographic Characteristics Form; the 12-item Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp) that utilized 5-point, Likert-style responses to items regarding meaning, peace, and faith (score range 0-48; higher scores indicate more spiritual well-being); the 23-item Ostomy Adjustment Scale that utilized 5-point, Likert-style responses to items regarding acceptance worry, social adjustment, and anger (score range 0-92; higher scores indicate better adjustment); and the 21-item Stoma Quality of Life Scale that used a combination of scoring methods (score range 0-100; higher scores imply better quality of life) and Likert-style questions. Data were transferred without patient names from the questionnaires directly into a software program for analysis. Descriptive statistics, correlation, and hierarchical regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: Of the 95 participants (52 [54.7%] men; mean participant age 56.54 +/- 13.74 years), mean scores were 31.66 +/- 7.39 for spiritual well-being, 51.73 +/- 12.28 for adjustment to a stoma, and 55.27 +/- 16.45 for quality of life. A statistically significant difference was found between the mean spiritual well-being and quality-of-life (r = 0.525, P <.001)and adjustment to a stoma (r =.549, P <.001) scores, and a significant relationship was noted between the mean quality-of-life and adjustment scores (r = 0.698, P <.001). Stoma adjustment and quality of life significantly correlated with the meaning and peace subscales of FACIT-Sp (P <.001). No correlation was found between faith or stoma adjustment and quality of life. Hierarchical regression analysis showed the most significant factors affecting quality of life were adjustment to a stoma (beta =.541) and spiritualwell-being (beta =.190). CONCLUSION: Adjustment and spirituality are important quality-of-life factors in patients with a stoma.Clinical assessments and practices should include the meaning and peace aspects of spiritual well-being and how well the patient is adjusting to the stoma. Well-designed randomized controlled studies that evaluate the impact of the spiritual dimension of nursing care on patient outcomes as well as the effect of spiritual well-being on adjustment to stoma are suggested.