Reliability of Different Clinical Techniques for Assessing Foot Posture

Kirmizi M., Cakiroglu M. A., ELVAN A., ŞİMŞEK İ. E., Angin S., Katip I.

JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, vol.43, no.9, pp.901-908, 2020 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Volume: 43 Issue: 9
  • Publication Date: 2020
  • Doi Number: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.02.002
  • Journal Name: JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Page Numbers: pp.901-908
  • Keywords: Reproducibility of Results, Foot, Body Weights and Measures, Procedures and Techniques Utilization, NAVICULAR DROP, FOOTPRINT INDEXES, VALIDATION, INK
  • Dokuz Eylül University Affiliated: Yes

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to determine the interrater and intrarater reliability of navicular drop (NDP), navicular drift (NDT), and the Foot Posture Index-6 (FPI-6), and test-retest reliability of the static arch index (SAI) and dynamic arch index (DAI).