Reliability of Different Clinical Techniques for Assessing Foot Posture

Kirmizi, Muge; Cakiroglu, Mehmet; ELVAN, ATA; ŞİMŞEK, İBRAHİM; Angin, Salih; Katip, Izmir

doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.02.002

Reliability of Different Clinical Techniques for Assessing Foot Posture

Kirmizi M., Cakiroglu M. A., ELVAN A., ŞİMŞEK İ. E., Angin S., Katip I.

JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, cilt.43, sa.9, ss.901-908, 2020 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
Cilt numarası: 43 Sayı: 9
Basım Tarihi: 2020
Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.02.002
Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS
Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE
Sayfa Sayıları: ss.901-908
Anahtar Kelimeler: Reproducibility of Results, Foot, Body Weights and Measures, Procedures and Techniques Utilization, NAVICULAR DROP, FOOTPRINT INDEXES, VALIDATION, INK
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: The aim was to determine the interrater and intrarater reliability of navicular drop (NDP), navicular drift (NDT), and the Foot Posture Index-6 (FPI-6), and test-retest reliability of the static arch index (SAI) and dynamic arch index (DAI).