Reliability of Different Clinical Techniques for Assessing Foot Posture

Kirmizi M., Cakiroglu M. A., ELVAN A., ŞİMŞEK İ. E., Angin S., Katip I.

JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, cilt.43, sa.9, ss.901-908, 2020 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 43 Sayı: 9
  • Basım Tarihi: 2020
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.02.002
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.901-908
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Reproducibility of Results, Foot, Body Weights and Measures, Procedures and Techniques Utilization, NAVICULAR DROP, FOOTPRINT INDEXES, VALIDATION, INK
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: The aim was to determine the interrater and intrarater reliability of navicular drop (NDP), navicular drift (NDT), and the Foot Posture Index-6 (FPI-6), and test-retest reliability of the static arch index (SAI) and dynamic arch index (DAI).