The use of molecular volumetric parameters for the evaluation of Lu-177 PSMA I&T therapy response and survival


Acar E., ÖZDOĞAN Ö., Aksu A., DEREBEK E., BEKİŞ R., Kaya G. C.

ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, cilt.33, sa.9, ss.681-688, 2019 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 33 Sayı: 9
  • Basım Tarihi: 2019
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s12149-019-01376-3
  • Dergi Adı: ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.681-688
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: PSMA, MTV, TLG, Tumor volume, Precision medicine, Theranostic, METABOLIC TUMOR BURDEN, METASTATIC PROSTATE-CANCER, RADIOLIGAND THERAPY, SOLID TUMORS, PET/CT, DIAGNOSIS, CRITERIA, BIOMARKER, LIGANDS, PERCIST
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Purpose The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the volumetric therapy response via Ga-68 PSMA I&T PET/CT in patients treated with Lu-177 PSMA I&T therapy. The secondary purpose was to determine the impact of volumetric parameter responses to overall survival. Methods PSMA tumor volumes (PSMA-TV) and tumor lesion PSMA expressions (TL-PSMA) were calculated with a semi-automatic program on Ga-68 PSMA I&T PET/CT images that were obtained before and after Lu-177 PSMA I&T therapies with 19 patients. The median overall survival was compared with PSMA-TV, TL-PSMA, SUVmax, PSA, and alteration in PERCIST criteria. Results PSMA-TV values were decreased in 12 patients (63%), and TL-PSMA values were decreased in 15 patients (79%) following the therapy. The SUVmax and the PSA values were also decreased in 14 (74%) and 10 (53%) patients, respectively. The complete remission (CR) was observed in two patients (10%). The partial response (PR) and progressive disease were observed in 6 (32%) and 11 (58%) patients, respectively, according to PRECIST criteria. The survival rates were statistically significant in patients with a decrease in PSMA-TV and TL-PSMA values than patients without any decrease (p 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). However, the survival rates did not differ in responders (PR or CR) and non-responders according to the PERCIST criteria (p 0.232). The survival rates did not also differ in responders and non-responders according to the SUVmax and PSA values (p 0.140, p 0.206, respectively). Conclusions Molecular and volumetric parameters are beneficial in the assessment of Lu-177 PSMA I&T therapy response. Although the number of patients is small, TL-PSMA response, which includes both the tumor volume and PSMA expression in tumor, may be considered as the most valuable parameter for the evaluation of the therapy response and the prediction of survival rate.