Smartphone addiction and health promotion lifestyle in university students: a cross-sectional analytical study


Creative Commons License

Serim Y., Limnili G., Gokdemir O., Özçakar N.

PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, cilt.27, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 27
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1017/s1463423625100753
  • Dergi Adı: PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Psycinfo, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: health promotion, smartphone, smartphone addiction, university students
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objectives: Smartphones have become essential, making our daily lives more manageable; however, excessive use may cause problems. University students are particularly vulnerable to smartphone addiction. This study examines the relationship between smartphone addiction and health-promoting lifestyles among university students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 911 students at Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey. Data were collected via Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV) and Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II). The printed forms were used, and the researcher administered the survey in person and recorded the responses. Results: Prevalence of smartphone addiction was 34.1%. Several factors were significantly associated, including female gender (p = 0.049), being single (p = 0.042), self-perceived smartphone addiction (p < 0.001), daytime sleepiness (p < 0.001), and poor sleep quality (p < 0.001). Students with smartphone addiction had significantly lower HPLP II scores (p = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that gender was no longer a significant factor. Those without a partner (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.07-2.03), those who considered themselves smartphone addicts (OR: 6.86, 95% CI: 4.99-9.42), and those with daytime sleepiness (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.08-2.14) had higher odds of smartphone addiction. Higher HPLP II scores were protective against smartphone addiction (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98-0.99). Conclusions: This study highlights that students with smartphone addiction engage in less health-promoting behaviours and experience poor sleep quality and daytime sleepiness. Self-perceived smartphone addiction was strongly associated with actual addiction, while a healthier lifestyle appeared to have a protective effect. There is a need for strategies to promote healthy habits and reduce smartphone addiction among university students.