ESTRO 2026, Stockholm, İsveç, 15 - 19 Mayıs 2026, ss.1, (Özet Bildiri)
Background: To determine whether combining pre-treatment Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)
DNA and PET-derived total lesion glycolysis (TLG) improves prognostic
stratification for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in
non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 86 consecutive, non-metastatic NPC patients
treated between 2010 and 2024 with curative-intent radiotherapy (RT) and/or
systemic therapy. Pre-treatment ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was analyzed in LIFEx; primary
and nodal lesions were delineated using a 40% SUVmax relative threshold, and
whole-body tumor burden metrics were computed (TLG = MTV × SUVmean). Plasma
EBV-DNA (copies/mL) was quantified by qPCR. Staging was performed according to
the AJCC/UICC 8th edition. RT technique was 3D-conformal in 16 patients and
IMRT/VMAT in 70 patients; all received EQD210 ≥69 Gy. Neoadjuvant
chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy were administered in 30 and 75
patients, respectively, while 27 patients received both. The EBV-DNA threshold
(3,500 copies/mL) was prespecified based on the literature, whereas the TLG threshold
(200) was derived through ROC analysis. Four subgroups were constructed:
Low–Low (EBV-DNAlow/TLGlow), High–Low (EBV-DNAhigh/TLGlow),
Low–High (EBV-DNAlow/TLGhigh), and High–High (EBV-DNAhigh/TLGhigh).
The primary endpoint was PFS; OS was a secondary endpoint.
Results: The cohort was predominantly male (67/86, 77.9%), with a median age of
49 years (12–76); 80.2% had stage III–IV disease. Median follow-up was 75.5
months (reverse Kaplan–Meier). The 3-year and 5-year PFS rates were 82.7% and
81.1%, respectively, and the 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 92.3% and 85.9%,
respectively. Twenty PFS events (23.3%) occurred, comprising 15 disease
progressions and 5 deaths without documented prior progression. In univariate
analysis (UVA) for PFS in the complete-case cohort (n = 59), TLG ≥200 (HR =
3.29, p = 0.038), T3–4 classification (HR = 3.21, p = 0.041), and EBV-DNAhigh/TLGhigh
group (HR = 4.01, p = 0.013) were significant predictors; EBV-DNA ≥3,500
copies/mL showed a trend (HR = 3.14, p = 0.058). In UVA for OS, TLG ≥200 (HR =
6.11, p = 0.025) and EBV-DNAhigh/TLGhigh group (HR =
4.13, p = 0.036) were significant. In multivariate analysis (MVA) for PFS (n =
59), EBV-DNAhigh/TLGhigh group remained an independent
predictor (adjusted HR = 3.97; 95% CI, 1.32–11.93; p = 0.014), along with T3–4
classification (adjusted HR = 3.18; 95% CI, 1.03–9.84; p = 0.045). In MVA for
OS, the EBV-DNAhigh/TLGhigh group remained significant
(adjusted HR = 4.13; 95% CI, 1.10–15.52; p = 0.036).
Conclusion: A combined pre-treatment stratification using TLG ≥200 and EBV-DNA
≥3,500 copies/mL identifies the EBV-DNAhigh/TLGhigh subgroup
as having significantly inferior PFS and OS, supporting a simple and
potentially clinically applicable risk-stratification approach; however,
external multicenter validation is warranted.