Comparison of early-onset and very early-onset people with multiple sclerosis based on cognitive and physical assessments


Kaya E., Özdoğar A. T., Karakaş H., Sağıcı Ö., Özakbaş S.

The 9th Joint ECTRIMS-ACTRIMS Meeting, Milan, İtalya, 11 - 13 Ekim 2023, ss.698, (Özet Bildiri)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Milan
  • Basıldığı Ülke: İtalya
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.698
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Introduction:  Early-onset  multiple  sclerosis  (MS,  EOMS)  and  very early-onset MS (VEOMS) are less common than adult-onset MS  (AOMS).  Moreover,  there  is  limited  information  regarding  EOMS and VEOMS prognosis compared with AOMS.Objectives/Aims: The aim was to assess and compare cognitive and physical functions between people with EOMS, VEOMS, and AOMS.Methods: People with EOMS (initial age between 18-12) (n=61), people with VEOMS (initial age between⩽12 years) (n=30), and age-, gender-, and type of MS-matched people with AOMS (initial age between 18-50 years) (n=97) were included. Cognitive func-tions   were   assessed   with   the   Brief   International   Cognitive   Assessment  for  Multiple  Sclerosis  (BICAMS)  battery,  which  included the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), the California Verbal  Learning  Test-2  (CVLT2),  and  the  Brief  Visuospatial  Memory  Test-Revised  (BVMT-R).  The  upper  extremity  function  was assessed using the Nine-Hole Peg Test (N-HPT). The Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25FW) and Timed up Go (TUG) were used to assess lower extremity function. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), disease duration, and number of relapses were recorded.Results: There was a significant difference in disease duration and number  of  relapses  between  the  three  groups  (disease  duration:  EOMS=12.44±8.03, VEOMS=19.46±10.74, AOMS=4.86±5.97, p<0.001;  the  number  of  relapses:  EOMS=4.57±2.58, VEOMS=4.80±2.50, AOMS=2.89±2.42, p<0.001). The post-hoc analyses revealed that people with VEOMS, as expected, have longer dis-ease  durations  than  people  with  AOMS  (p<0.001)  and  EOMS  (p=0.009), while people with AOMS have shorter disease duration than EOMS (p<0.001). Also, the relapse number was significantly less  in  the  AOMS  group  than  in  the  EOMS  (p<0.001)  and  the  VEOMS  (p=0.001)  groups.  However,  there  were  no  significant  differences between the three groups regarding EDSS score, cog-nitive  functions,  and  upper  and  lower  extremity  performance  (p>0.05).Conclusion:  This  study  pointed  to  two  significant  results.  First,  disease  duration  and  the  number  of  relapses  are  not  the  certain  parameters that negatively affect cognitive and physical functions in people with MS. Second, if the disease process is managed suc-cessfully, people with EOMS and VEOMS show the same cogni-tive and physical performance as people with AOMS.