PILE: a candidate prognostic score in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy


GÜVEN D. C., Yildirim H., BİLGİN E., AKTEPE O. H., Taban H., Sahin T., ...Daha Fazla

Clinical and Translational Oncology, cilt.23, sa.8, ss.1630-1636, 2021 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 23 Sayı: 8
  • Basım Tarihi: 2021
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s12094-021-02560-6
  • Dergi Adı: Clinical and Translational Oncology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, DIALNET
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1630-1636
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Biomarker, Immune checkpoint inhibitor, Pan-immune-inflammation value, PILE, PIV, Prognosis
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

Background: Although the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became a vital part of cancer care, many patients do not respond to treatment, indicating need for biomarkers. The Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) is a recently developed peripheral blood count-based biomarker. Herein, we evaluated a PIV-based candidate scoring system as a prognostic biomarker in ICI-treated patients. Methods: A total of 120 advanced cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 inhibitors for any cancer type were included in this study. The PILE scoring system incorporating the PIV (< median vs. ≥ median), lactate dehydrogenase levels (normal vs. > normal) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs. ≥ 1) was constructed from the multivariate analyses and used for stratification. The association between overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and PILE risk category was evaluated with multivariate analysis. Results: The median follow-up was 9.62 months and the median OS of all cohort were 12.42 ± 2.75 months. Patients with higher PIV had significantly decreased OS (7.75 ± 1.64 vs. 18.63 ± 4.26 months, p = 0.037). The patients in the PILE high-risk group (PILE score 2–3) had decreased OS (18.63 ± 4.02 vs. 5.09 ± 1.23 months, HR: 2.317, 95% CI: 1.450–3.700, p < 0.001) and PFS (7.69 ± 1.30 vs. 2.69 ± 0.65 months, HR: 1.931, 95% CI: 1.263–2.954, p = 0.002) compared to PILE low-risk group (PILE score 0–1). The Harrell C-Index values were 0.65 and 0.61 for OS and PFS prediction, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrated a decreased overall survival in ICI-treated patients with a higher PILE score. If prospective studies validate our results, PILE score could be a biomarker for immunotherapy.