CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE 25-QUESTION GERIATRIC LOCOMOTIVE FUNCTION SCALE


Creative Commons License

Gürpinar B., TUNA H., İLÇİN N.

TURKISH JOURNAL OF GERIATRICS-TURK GERIATRI DERGISI, cilt.28, sa.2, ss.239-249, 2025 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 28 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.29400/tjgeri.2025.440
  • Dergi Adı: TURKISH JOURNAL OF GERIATRICS-TURK GERIATRI DERGISI
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.239-249
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Geriatric Assessment, Locomotion, Aged
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Introduction: Locomotive syndrome, characterized by gait disorders, loss of balance, and cognitive difficulties, significantly impacts older adults by increasing morbidity and reducing independence. This study aimed to adapt the 25-item Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale into Turkish and evaluate its validity and reliability. Materials and Method: The translation process involved forward and backward translations by bilingual experts to ensure linguistic and conceptual equivalence with the original scale. A total of 250 individuals aged >= 65 years participated, completing the Turkish version of the scale alongside functional mobility tests; the timed up-and-go, five repetitions of sit-to-stand, two-step, and standing tests. Participants repeated the scale 1 week after the initial evaluation to assess the test-retest reliability. Results: The internal consistency of the Turkish version was excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.952). Test-retest reliability, assessed 1 week apart, yielded an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.974, indicating excellent reliability. Concurrent validity was examined by correlating scale scores with functional test results. Significant correlations were observed (p < 0.001), with Pearson's correlation coefficients of 0.472 for timed up-and-go, 0.504 for five repetitions of sit-to-stand,-0.871 for the two-step test, and-0.518 for the standing test. These findings demonstrate that the Turkish version is a valid and reliable tool for assessing mobility impairment and functional limitation in older adults. Conclusion: The adaptation and validation of the 25-item Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale into Turkish provide a comprehensive measure for evaluating and monitoring locomotor function, supporting early detection and intervention in this population.