Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
SOFT COMPUTING, ss.1-39, 2024 (SCI-Expanded)
Thus far in the available literature, capability-based distributed layout (CBDL) design approaches were only developed under certain environments. Indeed, uncertainties embedded in the machine unavailability (or random machine breakdowns), product demands, and process flow data were not considered by the previous studies to achieve a robust CBDL design. However, many real-life facility layout design applications may involve different types of uncertainties simultaneously, like fuzziness and stochasticity. Based on this motivation, for the first time in the literature, this paper introduces a novel robust capability-based distributed layout (R-CBDL) design problem under a mixed fuzzy-stochastic environment. First, a new fuzzy-stochastic optimization model of the R-CBDL design problem is developed by considering the random machine breakdowns and fuzzy demand/process flow data. Then, a hybrid solution approach based on a chance-constrained stochastic programming technique with a well-known interactive fuzzy resolution method is proposed. Thus, the random machine breakdowns and fuzzy part flow rates among different machining capabilities could be easily handled via the proposed approach. Fortunately, the proposed approach can also generate various risky and risk-free robust layout design alternatives under different probabilistic scenarios and uncertainty levels (α-cuts) according to the facility designer’s risk attitude. To show the validity and applicability of the proposed R-CBDL problem and hybrid solution approach, an extensive computational study with comparative analysis is first presented based on an illustrative numerical example under different machine capability overlap cases and probability distributions. Then, the performance of the proposed approach is also tested on a real-life cellular manufacturing system of a company. The computational experiments have shown that the proposed approach can accomplish more efficient robust layout design alternatives with on average 24.5% better total expected layout score when compared to the existing cellular layout of the manufacturing company.