Investigation of antifungal susceptibility of Aspergillus species isolated from systemic clinical specimens by different methods


Korkmaz E., Ergon M. C.

Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, cilt.50, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 50
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100642
  • Dergi Adı: Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, CAB Abstracts, EMBASE, Veterinary Science Database
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Antifungal susceptibility, Aspergillus, Broth microdilution, Disk diffusion, Gradient diffusion test
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Purpose: Due to the potential for Aspergillus species to cause lethal infections and the rising rates of antifungal resistance, the significance of antifungal susceptibility tests has increased. We aimed to assess the sensitivities of Aspergillus species to amphotericin B (AMB), voriconazole (VOR), itraconazole (ITZ), and caspofungin (CAS) using disk diffusion (DD) and gradient diffusion (GD) methods and compare them with broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference susceptibility method. Methods: The study involved 62 Aspergillus fumigatus, 28 Aspergillus flavus, and 16 Aspergillus terreus isolates, totaling 106 Aspergillus isolates. BMD and DD methods were performed in accordance with CLSI M38-A2 and CLSI M51-A documents, respectively. The GD method utilized nonsupplemented Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) as the medium. Results: In the BMD method, the lowest minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)90 or minimal effective concentration (MEC)90 values were observed for VOR and CAS (0.5 μg/mL and 0.06 μg/mL, respectively). AMB and ITZ MIC90 values were both 2 μg/mL. In our comparison of the GD method with the BMD method at ±2 dilution, we observed essential agreement rates of 91.6%, 99.1%, 100%, and 38.6% for AMB, VOR, ITZ, and CAS, respectively. When comparing DD and BMD methods, we found categorical agreement rates of 65.1%, 99.1%, 77.3%, and 100% for AMB, VOR, ITZ, and CAS, respectively. For GD and BMD methods, these rates were 79.2%, 99.1%, 87.8%, and 100%. Conclusions: Given the high essential and categorical agreement rates, we posit that the GD method is a viable alternative to the BMD method for AMB, ITZ and VOR but not for CAS. In addition, the use of nonsupplemented MHA in the GD method proves advantageous due to its cost-effectiveness and widespread availability compared to other growth media.