TwinCompass: A multi-criteria and hybrid reasoning decision support framework for Digital Twin engineering in Cyber–Physical Systems


Marah H., TEZEL B. T., Challenger M., Vangheluwe H.

Journal of Industrial Information Integration, cilt.52, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus) identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 52
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.jii.2026.101128
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Industrial Information Integration
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Compendex, INSPEC
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Cyber–Physical Systems, Decision support, Digital Twins, LLM, MCDM, Neuro-symbolic, Recommendation
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The design and development of Digital Twins (DTs) for Cyber–Physical Systems (CPS) entail navigating a vast decision space that encompasses choosing appropriate modeling paradigms, formalisms, computational tools, architectural patterns, deployment frameworks and strategies, and compliance standards. Current DT engineering practices predominantly rely on ad-hoc expert judgment and domain-specific experience, lacking systematic frameworks that integrate structured decision-making processes informed by established domain knowledge and expertise, and supported by advanced reasoning capabilities. This paper introduces TwinCompass, a multi-criteria and hybrid neuro-symbolic decision-making recommendation framework that synergistically combines Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods with Large Language Model (LLM)-based reasoning and symbolic logical inference. TwinCompass leverages a structured and hierarchical decision data model that encapsulates expert DT domain knowledge, represented as decision alternatives, each characterized by a well-defined set of features (criteria). To fundamentally resolve the cognitive bottleneck of manual criteria weighting in MCDM, TwinCompass provides both manual expert-driven and automated LLM-based judgment mechanisms, enabling scalable, adaptive, and context-aware recommendation generation. Furthermore, the framework incorporates a deterministic logical reasoning layer that strictly validates configurations against dependency constraints, compatibility, and prerequisites, ensuring coherent and structurally consistent DT designs. A comprehensive evaluation, including performance analysis of parsing data models, consistency validation of judgments, execution-time correlation analysis, and a qualitative assessment by 20 domain specialists, demonstrates the framework's effectiveness. The empirical results confirm that TwinCompass provides robust decision support, achieving high data-readiness scores under strict filtering conditions. These findings establish the reliability of its recommendations and its suitability for industrial-scale engineering. By addressing this critical gap in the complexity of designing and deploying DTs throughout their lifecycles, this research provides a principled, transparent, and automated decision-making approach that integrates expert knowledge with computational intelligence to support informed, advisable engineering choices.