The best location for proximal locking screw for femur interlocking nailing: A biomechanical study


Karaarslan A. A., KARAKAŞLI A., Aycan H., ÇEÇEN B., YILDIZ D. V., Sesli E.

INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, cilt.50, sa.1, ss.94-98, 2016 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 50 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2016
  • Doi Numarası: 10.4103/0019-5413.173508
  • Dergi Adı: INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.94-98
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Femur nail, femur shaft fractures, locking screw, three-point bending testMeSH terms, DIAMETER TIBIAL NAILS, BENDING STRENGTH, FATIGUE LIFE, PROTOTYPES, FRACTURES, FAILURE, FORCES
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: Proximal locking screw deformation and screw fracture is a frequently seen problem for femur interlocking nailing that affects fracture healing. We realized that there is lack of literature for the right level for the proximal locking screw. We investigated the difference of locking screw bending resistance between the application of screws on different proximal femoral levels. Materials and Methods: We used a total of 80 proximal locking screws for eight groups, 10 screws for each group. Three-point bending tests were performed on four types of screws in two different trochanteric levels (the lesser trochanter and 20 mm proximal). We determined the yield points at three-point bending tests that a permanent deformation started in the locking screws using an axial compression testing machine. Results: The mean yield point value of 5 mm threaded locking screws applied 20 mm proximal of lesser trochanter was 1022 49 (range 986u1057) (mean standard deviation, 95% confidence interval). On the other hand, the mean yield point value of the same type of locking screws applied on the lesser trochanteric level was 2089 249 (range 1911u2268). Which means 103% increase of screw resistance between two levels (P = 0.000). In all screw groups, on the lesser trochanter line we determined 98u174% higher than the yield point values of the same type of locking screws in comparison with 20 mm proximal to the lesser trochanter (P = 0.000). Conclusion: According to our findings, there is twice as much difference in locking screw bending resistance between these two application levels. To avoid proximal locking screw deformation, locking screws should be placed in the level of the lesser trochanter in nailing of 1/3 middle and distal femur fractures.