Comparison of two nutrition assessment techniques in hospitalized patients

Sungurtekin H., Sungurtekin U., HANCI V., Erdem E.

NUTRITION, cilt.20, sa.5, ss.428-432, 2004 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 20 Sayı: 5
  • Basım Tarihi: 2004
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.nut.2004.01.006
  • Dergi Adı: NUTRITION
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.428-432
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: nutritional assessment, subjective global assessment, nutrition risk index, SUBJECTIVE GLOBAL ASSESSMENT, SURGICAL PATIENTS, CLINICAL JUDGMENT, MALNUTRITION, COMPLICATIONS, PREVALENCE, MORTALITY, RISK
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Hayır

Özet

OBJECTIVE: Different methods have been used to assess nutritional status in hospitalized patients, and there is no agreement as to which index best reflects nutritional status. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of malnutrition and compare the Subjective Global Assessment, Nutrition Risk Index, and non-nutritional factors in hospitalized patients.