Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
Transfusion and Apheresis Science, cilt.56, sa.6, ss.832-835, 2017 (SCI-Expanded)
Biosimilar filgrastim (Leucostim®) was shown to be similar in terms of efficacy and safety in hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization (HPCM) compared to originator filgrastim (Neupogen®) and lenograstim (Granocyte®) in healthy donors and chemomobilization settings. Here we report our retrospective experience with Leucostim® (n: 43) compared to Neupogen® (n: 71) and Granocyte® (n: 32) in steady-state mobilization of patients presenting with Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma. The median age of patients on Leucostim® (56) arm was significantly higher compared to patients who received Neupogen® (50) and Granocyte® (49) (p: 0.039). Patients who underwent HPCM with Leucostim® received less chemotherapy lines (p: 0.026) and courses (p: 0.046) compared to others. Otherwise the study cohort was homogenous in terms of gender, primary diagnosis and various risk factors for mobilization failure. Mobilization failure was defined as failure to achieve a minimum threshold (10/μL) for peripheral blood CD34+ cell concentration to initiate leukapheresis or 0.5 × 106/kg, 0.8 × 106/kg and 2 × 106/kg CD34+ cells in first, second and fourth days of apheresis, respectively. The study groups were similar in terms of median number of CD34+ progenitor cell yield (× 106/kg) (Neupogen®: 6.18, Granocyte®: 6.2 and Leucostim®: 6.2) (p: 0.959) and median number of leukapheresis sessions (p: 0.615). The treatment arms were also similar in terms of mobilization failure (Neupogen® 11.3% − Granocyte® 21.9% − Leucostim® 16.3%; p: 0.366). No patient experienced any severe adverse effect during HPCM. Leucostim® is equally effective and safe in HPCM compared to originator G-CSF (Neupogen®) and lenograstim (Granocyte®) in steady-state HPCM setting.