Sanat Tarihi Dergisi, cilt.31, sa.1, ss.599-623, 2022 (ESCI)
Bu çalışma Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun en önemli liman kentlerinden biri olan İzmir’deki Sarıkışla binasına ek olarak inşa edilen ve Subay Mahfili olarak bilinen yapının tarihçesini araştırmayı, bu yapının kentin mimarlık tarihi açısından önemini vurgulamayı amaçlamaktadır. Yapının, kentteki önemli oryantalist mimari örneklerinden biri olması dolayısıyla çalışmada öncelikle Avrupa ve Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda oryantalist mimarinin ortaya çıkış ve yayılımı özetlenmiş ardından İzmir’deki örneklere değinilerek söz konusu yapı bu bağlam içerisine oturtularak incelenmiştir. İnşa tarihi kesin olarak bilinmeyen Subay Mahfili yaklaşık 50 yıl kullanıldıktan sonra eki olduğu Sarıkışla Binası ile birlikte 1955’te yıkılmış, yerini bugün Konak Meydanı olarak anılan boşluğa bırakmıştır. Ancak ne Sarıkışla ne de Subay Mahfili yıkılmaları ile kentin ve kentlilerin belleklerinden silinmemiştir. 1829 yılında inşa edilen Sarıkışla Binası bezemesiz, sade karakterine rağmen konumu, boyutu ve sahne olduğu olaylar göz önüne alındığında kentin en önemli yapılarından biridir. Subay Mahfili ise Sarıkışla ile tezat oluşturacak derecede bezemeli, oryantalist üslubun özelliklerini gerek mimari elemanlar gerekse bezeme motifleri ölçeğinde taşıyan nitelikli bir yapıdır. Çalışma kapsamında ulaşılan bilgiler sonucunda söz konusu yapının inşa tarihinin büyük olasılıkla 1913-1917, kesin olarak ise 1913-1922 arasında olması gerektiği saptanmıştır. Yapının tasarımının 19. yüzyıl sonu, 20. yüzyıl başında, Subay Mahfili’nin hemen karşısında, 1901 tarihinde inşa edilen ve yine oryantalist özellikler taşıyan Saat Kulesi’nin ve Sarıkışla’nın avlusundaki fıskiyeli havuzun mimarı olan Raymond Charles Péré’ye ait olabileceğine dair bazı destekleyici argümanlar da yine çalışma içerisinde sunulmuştur.
This study aims to examine the history of the Military Office building, which
was built in addition to the Sarikisla building in Izmir, one of the most important port
cities of the Ottoman Empire, and to emphasize the importance of this building in terms
of architectural history. The Military Office building, which was dated to the early 20th
century, was destroyed in 1955 after being used for nearly 50 years, and was replaced by
the space called Konak Square today. However, neither Sarikisla nor the Military Office
building were forgotten after their destruction. Both structures are still present in the
collective memory of the citizens, albeit indistinctly.
Orientalism, which is the dominant style of the Military Office building, is
basically a field of thought founded on the East-West duality. The main motivation for the
artistic counterpart of this broad-framed field of thought lies in the mysterious and mystical
world attributed to the East by the West. The Eastern-inspired Orientalism movement,
which was popular in European architecture in the first half of the 19th century, was also
reflected in Ottoman architecture as a part of the architectural interactions of the period.
First examples of Orientalist architecture began to be seen in the capital, Istanbul, and in
port cities such as Thessaloniki and Izmir, which had close relations with Europe. But it’s a
fact that, there is no comprehensive study on orientalist architecture in Izmir. It is difficult
to make an inclusive and detailed assessment, as the structures showing these features are
few. However, the fact that the Clock Tower, which is one of the most important structures
of the city, is in the orientalist style and it is a sign that this style has a considerable effect
on the city, especially at the turn of the century.
The Sarıkışla building, dated 1829, to which the Military Office building was
added, is one of the most important structures of the city with its location and size, despite
its plain character. Military Office building, on the other hand, is a qualified structure that
bears the characteristics of the orientalist style in its architectural elements and decoration
motifs in a way that contrasts with Sarikisla.
Despite its special architecture, it is not possible to reach a detailed research or
drawings on the structure of the Military Office building. There is also no information
on the architect of the building. Only some predictions can be made about this subject.
Raymond Charles Péré, the architect of the Clock Tower, which was built in 1901 right in
front of the Military Office building and also has orientalist features, is the first name that
comes to mind. The fact that the architect of the fountain pool in the courtyard of Sarıkışla
is also Péré strengthens this possibility. As a result of the information obtained within the
scope of the study, it was determined that the construction date of the building should most
probably be between 1913 and 1922.