Performance of non-invasive fibrosis markers in biopsy-proven liver disorders


DANIŞ N., Gunsar F., Yilmaz F., Nart D., Turan I., KARASU A. Z., ...Daha Fazla

Hepatology Forum, cilt.6, sa.1, ss.16-21, 2025 (Scopus) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 6 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2025
  • Doi Numarası: 10.14744/hf.2024.2024.0024
  • Dergi Adı: Hepatology Forum
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.16-21
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: FIB-4, liver biopsy, transient elastography
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background and Aim: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the concordance of Transient Elastography FibroScan® (FS) measurements, Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and the Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) scores with each other and with liver biopsies in predicting histological fibrosis. Materials and Methods: In this single-center, cross-sectional, retrospective collected data cohort study spanning seven consecutive years, simultaneous FS measurements, FIB-4, and APRI scores of 778 patients with different diagnoses who had undergone liver biopsy were evaluated. Results: A total of 417 (53.6%) of the patients were female. The median age was 51 years. The diagnoses were HBV (n=228), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (n=185), HCV (n=58), cryptogenic (n=53), primary biliary cholangitis (n=40), autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n=28), overlap syndrome (OS) (n=23), multiple diagnoses (n=42), and other diagnoses (n=83). All three methods showed a strong correlation with histological fibrosis, and FS demonstrated a statistically significantly superior relationship compared to FIB-4 and APRI. In AIH and OS, FIB-4 and APRI scores do not show a consistent increase with histological stage; however, FS does. In MASLD, all three methods correlate with histologic stage, but FS measurements appear significantly superior. Conclusion: Although FIB-4, APRI, and FS correlate well with histological fibrosis, especially in MASLD, evaluation with FS, if available, should be preferred. In the evaluation of fibrosis in AIH and OS, laboratory-based indicators should be avoided.