Is dry heat treatment (fluidotherapy) effective in improving hand function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis? A randomized controlled trial


Gunduz N., Erdem D., Kızıl R., Solmaz D., Önen F., Ellidokuz H., ...Daha Fazla

CLINICAL REHABILITATION, cilt.33, sa.3, ss.485-493, 2019 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 33 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2019
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1177/0269215518810778
  • Dergi Adı: CLINICAL REHABILITATION
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.485-493
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Rheumatoid arthritis, hand function, dry heat treatment, fluidotherapy, JOINT PROTECTION PROGRAM, EXERCISE THERAPY, PEOPLE, DISABILITY, OUTCOMES, PREVALENCE, VALIDATION
  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of dry heat treatment (fluidotherapy) in improving hand function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Setting: Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Rheumatology in a university hospital. Subjects: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Interventions: All patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 underwent dry heat treatment (fluidotherapy) and Group 2 was a control group. Patients in both groups participated in a joint protection and exercise program. Main measures: Primary outcome measures were Health Assessment Questionnaire and Duruoz Hand Index. Secondary outcome measures were pain and stiffness, Grip Ability Test, Disease Activity Score-28, and grip strength. These assessments were performed at the hospital at baseline, week 3, and week 12. Results: A total of 93 participants were allocated to Group 1 (n = 47) and Group 2 (n = 46). The mean age of these groups was 54.19 +/- 11.15 years and 53.00 +/- 10.15 years, respectively (P = 0.592). At baseline, there were no significant differences between the groups in any parameter except significantly poorer Health Assessment Questionnaire score in Group 1 (P = 0.007). At week 3, there were no significant differences between the groups in any of the parameters (P > 0.005). At week 12, Duruoz Hand Index scores were significantly better in Group 2 (P = 0.039). Conclusion: Dry heat treatment (fluidotherapy) was not effective in improving hand function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Moreover, no positive effect on any other clinical parameters was observed.