Building Resilience through Initiatives Defining Growth Potential of Economic Solutions for Syrians in Türkiye (BRIDGES) – III


Akgüngör E. S.

Diğer Ülkelerin Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları Tarafından Desteklenmiş Proje, 2023 - 2023

  • Proje Türü: Diğer Ülkelerin Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları Tarafından Desteklenmiş Proje
  • Başlama Tarihi: Ekim 2023
  • Bitiş Tarihi: Kasım 2023

Proje Özeti

The external evaluation described in this inception report was requested by DRC to provide an externally assessed perspective on the results and changes contributed by the programme. The main objective of the external evaluation is to document and inform programme stakeholders (DRC, implementing partners, donor, and programme participants on the relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability, and impact of the programme interventions. This evaluation will adhere firmly to the OECD/DAC Evaluation criteria[1], tailored specifically for the humanitarian context in alignment with the ALNAP principles[2]

Furthermore, this evaluation aims to provide pragmatic recommendations, fostering an environment for continuous learning and improvement. It plays an important role in cataloguing the knowledge and experiences gained from this programme, then transferring these learnings into the strategic planning and implementation of future DRC programmes, thus strengthening their potential to achieve effective results.

 

The evaluation has the following specific objectives:

·         To appraise the performance against key evaluation criteria for all activities executed by DRC and partners;

·         Appraise the BRIDGE III in terms of coordination, appropriateness, complementarity, and coverage with the local capacities, market needs, network of relevant actors, and authorities;

·         Evaluate the implementation concerning participation, information sharing, and accountability to the affected populations.

·         Identify any lessons learned and best practices from the program implemented by DRC and its partners.

·         Additionally, provide recommendations based on the findings for DRC, its implementing partners, KfW, and relevant stakeholders.

·         Assess and identify any key internal and external factors that have contributed to, affected, or impeded the achievements, and subsequently evaluate how DRC and its partners have managed these factors.

·         The evaluator’s work will be based on six criteria: Relevance, Effectiveness, Impact, Efficiency, Sustainability, and Coherence.



[1]OECD. Better Criteria for Better Evaluation Revised Evaluation Criteria Definitions and Principles for Use OECD/DAC Network on Development Evaluation. 2019.

[2]  Beck, T. (2003). Evaluating Humanitarian Action an ALNAP Guidance Booklet. ALNAP.